Esparza v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.

ORDER

BOLAND, United States Magistrate Judge.

These cases, which have been consolidated for purposes of pretrial discovery, are before me on the following motions:(1) Plaintiffs’ Response (and “Cross Motion”) to Joint Motion By Defendants for Stay of Discovery Responses (the “Plaintiffs’ Motion for Stay”), filed on June 7, 2001; and(2) Defendants’ Response to Plaintiffs’ Cross Motion for Stay and Renewed Motion for Stay of Discovery Responses Pending District Judge’s Ruling on Rule 72 Objections (the “Defendants’ Renewed Motion”), filed June 13, 2001.

Both motions are DENIED.

These cases have…