Legal Opinion

Sofman v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 1, 2020No. 10-157Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims WILLIAM KOOPMANN, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 09-cv-333 T v. Filed: December 1, 2020 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. PETER SOFMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 10-cv-157 T v. Filed: December 1, 2020 THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant’s “Motion to Dismiss Claims of Forty-Six Individual Plaintiffs for Want of Prosecution” pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (Rules). See ECF Nos. 319 (Koopmann) & 199 (Sofman). Specifically, Defendant argues that this Court should…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Claude E. Atkins Enterprises, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. ['Cartagena v. Centerpoint Nine, Inc.']District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Fuselier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Ahmed v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API