Legal Opinion
Fuselier v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 18, 2004No. 04-951 TPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BLOCK, Judge.
Plaintiff, Richard Fuselier, has demonstrated a propensity to beat dead horses in more ways than one. First, in his numerous filings in this case,2 he has trotted out again *10and again a familiar set of specious arguments. Second, plaintiff has filed multiple separate cases in this court that are little more than re-runs of the same specious arguments. See below. Third, plaintiff apparently is part of an increasing number of misguided individuals who are unable to restrain themselves from making the same specious arguments. See below.
The defendant has opposed each…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rezi P. Forshey, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Charles William Ledford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- James A. Murray, Justin L. Murray and Joan M. Murray v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Michael W. Lovell and Phyllis D. Lovell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- John M. Casper v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Skillo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Marlin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Hinck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Dumont v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Alli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.