Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Teasley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 4, 1994No. A94A1028Published

1ConcurrenceBlackburn, Judge

I concur fully with the majority’s opinion in Divisions 2 and 3. Although I concur in the result reached by the majority in Division 1, I write separately to reiterate the three-step process for evaluating a Batson challenge. Teasley does not challenge the racial makeup of the venire.

In order to establish a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination in violation of Batson, a criminal defendant must show that he is a member of a cognizable racial group, that the prosecutor exercised peremptory strikes to exclude jurors on account of their race, and that these facts and any other relevant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  2. Henderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
  3. Diggs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API