Legal Opinion

Simmons Hardware Co. v. Kaufman & Runge

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1888No. 6299PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Milam. Tried below before Hon. W. E. Collard.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Associate Justice.

—The Simmons Hardware Company and other creditors accepting under a statutory assignment made by Thomas F. Hudson & Son brought this suit in the name of the assignee C. E. Wynne, who had refused to bring it, against Kaufman & Runge and others to set aside certain deeds of trust alleged to have been executed by the assignors in contemplation of the assignment. The assignee Wynne having been removed and John B. Wolfe appointed in his stead, the latter intervened in the suit as a party plaintiff, and adopted the allegations and joined in the prayer of the plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steffian v. Milmo National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Lancaster v. DolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
  3. Elser v. GraberTexas Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Porter v. GreenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
  5. Oppenheimer v. M. Halff & Bro.Texas Supreme Court · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Watts v. Corner, Walker & DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  2. Johnson v. MastersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Eastman v. KellyNew York Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Hudson v. ChildreeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Jackson v. BowieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API