Eastman v. Kelly
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, New York county; Andrews, Justice. Action to enforce a judgment rendered against Daniel Kelly in favor of Lydia M. Eastman and others against lands standing in the name of Mary J.' Jones. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.
Without passing upon the merits of the controversy between the parties to this action, it is apparent that the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial ordered, because of the errors in the admission of evidence which may have influenced the court below in reference to the conclusions arrived at from the evidence. This action was brought by the plaintiffs, as judgment creditors of the defendant Kelly, to reach certain interests which it was claimed the defendant Kelly had in property standing in the name of the defendant Mary J. Jones. One James Kearney was the attorney for the plaintiff in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Michael v. . FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Goodwin Gas Stove & Meter Co.'s AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
- Todd v. MunsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1886
- Cady v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- House v. HouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wallace v. KopenbrinkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Howe v. StuartCity of New York Municipal Court · 1910
- McIntyre v. CostelloNew York Supreme Court · 1889