Fulton Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox Connty. —"Will D. "Weight, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams
This is an action on a policy of liability insurance for the recovery of the amount the complainant com pany was held to pay one of the employee’s in its factory, one Kendrick, in an action at law successfully prosecuted by the latter, which defendant had refused to defend.
The policy indemnified the Pulton Company in this language:
“Subject to the limits hereinafter provided for a- , gainst loss from the liability imposed by law upon the assured for damages on account of bodily injuries . . . accidently suffer or alleged to have been suffered by any employee ... of the assured, by reason of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Norman v. Virginia-Pocahontas Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
- Queen v. Dayton Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Tozer v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Stetz v. F. Mayer Boot & Shoe Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
- Iron & Wire Co. v. GreenTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Fessenden School, Inc. v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Leonard v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944
- Brodek v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
- Dempster Bros., Inc. v. United States Fidelity & G. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. AusbrooksTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.