Legal Opinion

United States v. Baker

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 28, 2012No. 11-1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

William Baker pled guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, to one count of sexual exploitation of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). In the plea agreement, the Government agreed to recommend a sentence at the low end of Baker’s advisory sentencing guidelines range. The district court, 1 however, imposed a longer sentence, and Baker now appeals, arguing that the Government breached the agreement with its comments at sentencing. We affirm.

At his change-of-plea hearing, Baker admitted the truthfulness of the following facts set forth in the plea agreement.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Louis F. PiraniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  3. United States of America v. Timothy Has No HorsesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. PatonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Luke KellerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Christopher BaskinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Eric ZurheideCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Derrecol JenningsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
  4. United States v. Radames RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Scott JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API