Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ault

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 21, 1974No. Appeal, 376PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Van der Voort, J.,

Henry Ault, after trial by jury, was convicted of assault and solicitation to commit sodomy and corrupting the morals of a minor child. After post-trial motions, he filed this appeal in which his sole claim is that the trial judge erred in permitting the minor, who was the alleged victim of the crimes, to testify.

In reviewing the Appellant’s claim, which basically rests on assertions that the witness was incompetent due to mental immaturity, we must be mindful of certain legal concepts and requirements. These matters were discussed in detail by our Supreme Court in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosche v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. AllabaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Commonwealth v. TroySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Commonwealth v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. FurmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MangelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. StonerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. SpeicherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API