Commonwealth v. Ault
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Van der Voort, J.,
Henry Ault, after trial by jury, was convicted of assault and solicitation to commit sodomy and corrupting the morals of a minor child. After post-trial motions, he filed this appeal in which his sole claim is that the trial judge erred in permitting the minor, who was the alleged victim of the crimes, to testify.
In reviewing the Appellant’s claim, which basically rests on assertions that the witness was incompetent due to mental immaturity, we must be mindful of certain legal concepts and requirements. These matters were discussed in detail by our Supreme Court in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rosche v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. AllabaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. TroySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
- Commonwealth v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. FurmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MangelloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. StonerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. SpeicherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979