Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mangello

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1977No. 505PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, Judge:

This appeal arises from appellant’s conviction by a jury of raping and indecently assaulting a five year-old girl. The only issue which appellant raises here which he preserved by written post-trial motions is the question whether the victim, since she was an infant, was competent to testify. 1

In general, the competency of a witness to testify is presumed and the burden falls on the party objecting to demonstrate the witness’ incompetence. Rosche v. McCoy, 397 Pa. 615, 156 A.2d 307 (1959). However, when a child under the age of fourteen is called to testify, the presumption…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rosche v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. AllabaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Commonwealth v. RimmelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth v. DrummondSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Commonwealth v. PennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Larsen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. ShortSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API