Commonwealth v. Mangello
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
This appeal arises from appellant’s conviction by a jury of raping and indecently assaulting a five year-old girl. The only issue which appellant raises here which he preserved by written post-trial motions is the question whether the victim, since she was an infant, was competent to testify. 1
In general, the competency of a witness to testify is presumed and the burden falls on the party objecting to demonstrate the witness’ incompetence. Rosche v. McCoy, 397 Pa. 615, 156 A.2d 307 (1959). However, when a child under the age of fourteen is called to testify, the presumption…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rosche v. McCoySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Commonwealth v. AllabaughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Commonwealth v. RimmelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. DrummondSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AndersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. PennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Larsen v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BaileySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. ShortSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.