Legal Opinion

Secrest v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 30, 2013No. 11-4358-cvUnpublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff-Appellant Linda Secrest appeals from an October 5, 2011 judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, following a jury verdict for Defendant-Appellee Merck, Sharpe & Dohme Corp. on her design defect claims. Secrest alleges that she suffered osteonecrosis — bone death— of the jaw (“ONJ”) as a result of taking Merck’s prescription osteoporosis drug, Fosamax. On appeal, Secrest contends that: (1) the District Court erred in granting Merck summary judgment on her failure-to-warn claim; (2) the District Court’s jury instructions did not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Ohler v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Chin v. Port Authority of New York & New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Oscar Rosa, Vincent Lopez, Ricardo Rodriguez, Hector Hernandez, and Armando VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Book Dog Books, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. In re Puda Coal Securities Inc., LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Brutton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  4. Jo v. JPMC Specialty Mortg., LLCDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019
  5. American Honda Motor Co., Inc. v. Sarah MilburnTexas Supreme Court · 2024

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API