Legal Opinion

Hein v. Cuprum, S.A. De CV.

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided March 30, 2001No. 1:99-cv-01360PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

KAHN, District Judge.

Presently before the Court is defendant Cuprum’s- motion to amend and, in the alternative, to dismiss. For the following reasons, defendant Cuprum’s motion is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff received a six-foot aluminum ladder as a gift in the spring of 1997. That ladder was purchased at an outlet store of defendant Hechinger’s successor corporation, Builder’s Square, located in Colonie, New York. Defendant Cuprum manufactured the ladder in Mexico.

Two years after receiving the ladder, Plaintiff alleges that it unexpectedly collapsed beneath him, causing…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Savage & Associates, P.C. v. Williams Communications (In Re Teligent Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  2. New York v. Mountain Tobacco Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  3. Paola A. Alvardo-Fernandez v. Matthew MazoffDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Mattheos v. JLG Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2022
  5. Prashaw v. Titan Mining CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API