Legal Opinion

Sprangers v. Greatway Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 2, 1993No. 92-1617PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company appeals a nonfinal order 1 denying its motion for summary judgment. Threshermen's argues that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Learman-Schaller Post 2732, V.F.W. Clubhouse (VFW), against the claims for negligent distribution of liquor to a minor. Thresher-men's claims that the plain language of the insurance policy's liquor liability exclusion excludes coverage. We agree that the policy provides no coverage. The VFW also argues that it is entitled to reform the policy and that Threshermen's is estopped from denying coverage because it failed to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wirth v. EhlyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Smith v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Lambert v. WrenschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Nelson v. DavidsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sprangers v. Greatway Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. BlazerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1999
  3. Samuels Recycling Co. v. CNA Ins. Cos.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  4. Budget Rent-A-Car Systems, Inc. v. Shelby Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  5. Frank v. Wisconsin Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API