Legal Opinion

State v. Hall

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1931No. File No. 6988PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPolley, P. J.

In this case appellant was convicted on an information charging that she practiced deceit and fraud and used menace and threats with intent to prevent Anna Hart and Hazel Hart from appearing and giving testimony at a certain preliminary hearing then pending in the municipal court of Sioux Falls, wherein one Fred Westling was 'being prosecuted on a charge of rape in the second degree committed' upon said Hazel Hart.

During the trial appellant called to the witness stand as a witness on behalf of appellant one Sophia Westling, mother of the said Fred Westling, and asked that the said Sophia…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Hackley v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  2. Ex parte SticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. People v. BermelNew York Supreme Court · 1911
  4. State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  5. State v. WilcoxSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. SinnottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. RosalesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Stewart v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Poach v. SlySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Shifflett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API