Legal Opinion

People v. Thomas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memo*950randum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [3]) and endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1]). Defendant failed to preserve for our review his present contention that counts two and three of the indictment are duplicitous (see, People v Fontanez, 254 AD2d 762, 765, lv denied 93 NY2d 852). That contention is without merit in any event. “ Where an offense may be committed by doing any one of several things, the indictment may, in a single count, group…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. CharlesNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. NicholasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  5. People v. GeorgeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. CarrollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. BryanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. People v. StromanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. People v. RaymondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API