Legal Opinion
S.A. Mineracao Da Trindade-Samitri v. Utah International Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 11, 1984No. 83 Civ. 2176 (GLG)PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOETTEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff S.A. Mineracao da Trindade-Samitri (“Samitri”), a Brazilian corporation, brought this action to obtain, inter alia, a declaratory judgment and damages against six defendants, corporations in Brazil, Panama and the United States (the “Defendants”), 1 charging that the Defendants fraudulently induced Samitri to enter into a $600,000,000 2 international iron ore mining venture, and alleging seventeen assorted claims under the laws of Brazil and the United States. 3 The Defendants have moved, pursuant to the United States Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-14,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Edward L. Greenblatt v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Genesco, Inc. v. KakiuchiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Security Watch, Inc. v. Sentinel Systems, Inc. American Telephone and Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,584 Avc Nederland B v. V. Atrium Investment Partnership, Pieter Kuik and Robert K. Lenting, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.