Knapp v. . Roche
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court, in the city of ISIew York, reversing an order of Special Term, which denied a motion on behalf of defendant that plaintiff be required “to perfect his judgment in this action and to file a judgment-roll * * * in conformity with the decision of the General Term.”
Read the full summary
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court, in the city of ISIew York, reversing an order of Special Term, which denied a motion on behalf of defendant that plaintiff be required “to perfect his judgment in this action and to file a judgment-roll * * * in conformity with the decision of the General Term.” The order of General Term also ordered that plaintiff “enter judgment in this action upon the decision heretofore made by the General Term, * * * and file a judgment-roll with the clerk * * "x" within twenty days after service of a copy of this order.” And that in so doing…
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.
After an appeal in this action to the General Term of the Superior Court, which resulted in an affirmance, provided • the plaintiff should stipulate to reduce his judgment by a specified amount, the respondent filed his stipulation and the decision of the General Term, claiming that thereby he had duly entered his judgment. The defendant, insisting that it had not been duly entered and perfected, made a motion that the plaintiff be required to perform that duty, which motion, denied at Special Term, was granted on appeal from that order by the General Term. The argument of the original…
2Cited by13 opinions
- In re WeberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Robinson v. . GoversNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Good v. . DalandNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- State v. Scott, County Com'r.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Commercial Bank v. FoltzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.