Legal Opinion

Good v. . Daland

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1890PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Motion to dismiss appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

The defendants had sixty days after the service on their attorney of a copy of the judgment and notice of the entry thereof, within which to appeal to this court, and the right to have the appeal heard in a case like this was subject to the further condition that a certificate should be obtained from the general term. Code, § 190, subd. 4. The certificate was obtained December 9, 1889, and notice of appeal was served on the plaintiff’s 'attorney, together with a copy of the certificate, December 16, 1889, The motion to dismiss is based on two grounds: (1) That the time to appeal had expired…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Knapp v. . RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Goelet v. . SpoffordNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. Bismarck Water Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Deygoo v. Eastern Abstract Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Livingston v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Martin v. Manufacturers' Accident Indemnity Co.New York Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Union Pacific Railroad v. GraceWyoming Supreme Court · 1914

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API