Legal Opinion

G.K.M. v. E.B.M.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 16, 1998No. 2961165PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONROE, Judge.

After more than 32 years of marriage, G.K.M., the wife, and E.B.M., the husband, were divorced on February 19, 1997. The wife appeals, asking this court to review the decisions of the trial court regarding periodic alimony, division of marital property, and attorney fees.

The only testimony presented to the trial court ore tenus concerns the issue of attorney fees. The parties submitted depositions as to all other issues. Because the trial court did not take oral testimony on those issues, the ore tenus rule does not apply as to them. Thus, all issues, except the issue of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lutz v. LutzCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  2. Sevigny v. NEW SOUTH FEDERAL SAV. & LOANSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Cross v. RudderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. T.L.H. v. R.A.R.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
  2. G.K.M. v. E.B.M.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Wallace v. WallaceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  4. Brandt v. BrandtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API