Legal Opinion

G.K.M. v. E.B.M.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 4, 1998No. 1970993 and 1970994PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHORES, Justice.

Both parties sought certiorari review of the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals in G.K.M. v. E.B.M., 728 So.2d 1102 (Ala.Civ.App.1998). We quash the writ as having been improvidently granted. In doing so, we note that we agree with the Court of Civil Appeals, both with the majority opinion and with Judge Robertson’s special opinion, that on remand the trial court should consider all assets included in the marital property (including the judicial retirement) in reaching an equitable distribution of that property, and that the trial court is not precluded from reconsidering…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. G.K.M. v. E.B.M.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1998
  2. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wallace v. WallaceCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API