Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilson

District Court, D. Utah

Decided February 2, 2005No. 2:03-cr-00882PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REAFFIRMING DECISION TO GIVE GREAT WEIGHT TO THE SENTENCING GUIDELINES IN DETERMINING APPROPRIATE SENTENCES

CASSELL, District Judge.

Nearly three weeks ago, defendant James Wilson came before the court for sentencing on an armed robbery. Because the sentencing occurred one day after the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, 1 the court was required to consider the Federal Sentencing Guidelines in their “advisory” capacity. The court issued a memorandum decision explaining that it would give strong consideration to the Guidelines sentence, although…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Jermaine HuntCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. PimentalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  3. United States v. JaberDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
  4. United States v. PhelpsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2005
  5. United States v. Perez-ChavezDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API