State v. Whalen
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRAMMER, Judge.
Following a jury trial, appellant Carl Whalen was convicted of one count of attempted participation in a criminal syndicate and eight counts of fraudulent scheme or practice. A.R.S. §§ 13-2308, 13-2311. Whalen raises a number of issues on appeal. He contends that the trial court erred by: (1) denying him the right of self-representation; (2) appointing defense counsel to represent him against his will, who then advanced a defense he neither approved nor authorized; (3) failing to direct a verdict in his favor as to all charges based upon insufficient evidence; and (4)…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. Fabio Evelio GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. McLemoreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- People v. TalidisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.