Legal Opinion

State v. Whalen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 24, 1997No. 2 CA-CR 96-0766PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRAMMER, Judge.

Following a jury trial, appellant Carl Whalen was convicted of one count of attempted participation in a criminal syndicate and eight counts of fraudulent scheme or practice. A.R.S. §§ 13-2308, 13-2311. Whalen raises a number of issues on appeal. He contends that the trial court erred by: (1) denying him the right of self-representation; (2) appointing defense counsel to represent him against his will, who then advanced a defense he neither approved nor authorized; (3) failing to direct a verdict in his favor as to all charges based upon insufficient evidence; and (4)…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. AtwoodArizona Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. State v. Fabio Evelio GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. McLemoreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  5. People v. TalidisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2023

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API