Legal Opinion

People v. Carson

California Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 2005No. S117568PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

We granted review in this case to determine whether a trial court may terminate or revoke a criminal defendant’s right of self-representation only for in-court misconduct. (See Ferrel v. Superior Court (1978) 20 Cal.3d 888, 891 [144 Cal.Rptr. 610, 576 P.2d 93] (Ferrel).) We conclude that neither the language nor the logic of Faretta v. California (1975) 422 U.S. 806 [45 L.Ed.2d 562, 95 S.Ct. 2525] (Faretta) imposes such a limitation. Regardless of where it occurs, a court may order termination for misconduct that seriously threatens the core integrity of the trial.

Factual and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. People v. DuranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. People v. LynchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  2. People v. TrujequeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. People v. KirvinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. People v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. People v. EspinozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API