Legal Opinion
City of Rockland v. Camden & Rockland Water Co.
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 5, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, C. J.
The record shows that the respondent is the operator of a system of waterworks. Ten persons and corporations, interested only as customers, complained to the Public Utilities Commission for reductions of service rates. After notice, and upon hearing, the complaint was ordered dismissed. The case is brought forward on exceptions to rulings that provisions in the special act under which corporate organization had been formed, restrictive of holding property and declaring dividends, neither restrained nor controlled the rate fixing power of the Commission.
The Camden and Rockland Water Company,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- National Bank v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Jones v. HabershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- National Bank v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Fritts v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Reynolds v. Crawfordsville First National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Farrell v. SchubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. Fin & Feather ClubSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- Central Maine Power Co. v. Maine Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.