Legal Opinion

Dino v. Farrell Lines, Inc.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 1, 1999No. Civ.A. 99-1155(AJL)Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LECHNER, District Judge.

This is an action by plaintiffs Joseph Dino (“Dino”) and Patricia Dino (collectively “Plaintiffs”), against defendants, Farrell Lines, Inc., SS Argonaut (“Farrell”) and also, by third-party plaintiff, Farrell, against third party-defendant, American Maritime Services, Inc. (“AMS”) (collectively “Defendants”). Plaintiffs filed a Complaint (the “Complaint”) in the Superi- or Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County alleging damages, under Section 905(b) of the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (the “Act” or “LHWCA”), 33 U.S.C. § 905(b), for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Scindia Steam Navigation Co. v. De Los SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Judson C. Brewer v. Quaker State Oil Refining Corporation Quaker State CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API