Legal Opinion

Amusement Corp. v. Mattson

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 10, 1943No. 10691PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The suit was against two defendants, appellant and one Corbett, for infringing use of a “new and useful improvement in a moving target adapted for use in shooting galleries and similar places where target practice is carried on”, and for the damages and profits resulting therefrom. Appellant, through some oversight not explained in the record, defaulted, and there was an interlocutory decree and injunction and a reference to a special master to ascertain gains and profits and damages. Appellant, learning of the reference, appeared by counsel in the proceedings before…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Co. v. Wagner Electric & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Sammons v. Colonial Press, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942
  5. Yesbera v. Hardesty Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1908

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Braun Inc. And Braun Aktiengesellschaft, Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Dynamics Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  2. Laskowitz v. Marie Designer, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1954
  3. Henry Hanger & Display Fixture Corp. v. Sel-O-Rak Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  4. Henry Hanger & Display Fixture Corporation of America v. Sel-O-Rak Corporation, Sel-O-Rak Corporation v. Henry Hanger & Display Fixture Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API