Legal Opinion

United States v. Brent Wilkes

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 10, 2014No. 11-50152, 12-50257PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:

On November 5, 2007, a jury convicted Brent Wilkes on thirteen charges, including wire fraud, bribery, conspiracy, and money laundering, in connection with his long-running scheme to bribe former Congressman Randall “Duke” Cunningham. Wilkes was sentenced to 144 months in prison and ordered to pay a $636,116 criminal forfeiture or a $500,000 fine. Following our remand in United States v. Wilkes, 662 F.3d 524 (9th Cir.2011) (Wilkes I), Wilkes raises three issues in this appeal.

Wilkes first argues that his right to a fair trial was violated under United States v.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Martin SigillitoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Benjamin GaleckiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023
  3. State v. David GatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
  4. People v. KoyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  5. Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API