Legal Opinion
In re Bronx Parkway Commission
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 9, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kelly, P. J.:
We affirm the final order in this proceeding upon the opinion of the learned justice at Special Term. [See post, p. 528.] We desire to state in addition to his conclusions there stated, that there is no dispute as to the principles laid down in Matter of Bronx Parkway Commission [Kraft] (191 App. Div. 212) and Matter of City of New York (171 id. 834), so earnestly pressed upon us by counsel. In proceedings to take private property for the public use the owner may have exaggerated ideas as to the value of his property. That is not unusual. Parties claiming damages in all kinds of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
- In re the Bronx Parkway CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. NewboldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- In re Bronx Parkway CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
- In re the Town of GuilfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Board of Hudson River Regulating District v. CadyNew York Supreme Court · 1928
- In re the Chittenango-Cazenovia, Part 1, Highway, New York County Courts1927
- In re Bronx Parkway CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925