Legal Opinion

Modern Woodmen of America v. Cummins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

* (1) Attorney Client, 6 C.J., sections 363, 426; (2) Interpleader, 33 C.J., section 63. Plaintiff brought this action to require the defendants to interplead for the proceeds of a life insurance policy. The policy was issued by plaintiff to William M. Cummins in the sum of three thousand dollars, payable at the death of said Cummins, to his wife, Ottilie Cummins, as beneficiary. Plaintiff's petition was founded upon adverse and conflicting claims made by the defendants for the amount due under the policy. Defendant Anderson answered, claiming a lien on the policy to the amount of seven…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wait v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Miller v. St. Louis & Kansas City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. Alexander v. Grand Avenue Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Frissell & Johnson v. HaileSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
  5. Kersey v. O'DaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Yellow Manufacturing Acceptance Corp. v. American Taxicabs, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Endler v. State Bank Trust Co. of WellstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  3. Lee v. New Age Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API