Gusman v. Mathews
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLevine, J.
Error proceedings are prosecuted from the decision of the common pleas court by Maurice Gusman and others, who were defendants in the trial court.
The defendant in error, Fannie Mathews, who was plaintiff in the trial court, alleges in her petition that she is the owner in fee of two parcels of land, with buildings thereon, situated on Prospect avenue, Cleveland, Ohio; that on the 20th day of October, 1920, she executed a lease in writing to defendants Maurice Gusman and Adolph Weinberger for a term of 99 years, beginning November 1, 1920, in consideration of the covenants and agreements of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ralston Steel Car Co. v. RalstonOhio Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by3 opinions
- Houston v. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Childs v. Warner Bros. Southern Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- General Development Corp. v. Wilbur-Rogers Atlanta Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1971