Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Ware

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 20, 1916No. 6493PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court — Judge Pendleton. November 25, 1914.

1Opinion of the Court

Broyles, J. 1.

The demurrer to the original petition was properly overruled by the trial court.

2. Certiorari lies to review the judgment of a trial judge of the municipal court of Atlanta, although the plaintiff in certiorari has not exhausted his remedies provided by the act creating that court, he not having entered an appeal to the appellate division thereof. Young v. Broyles, 16 Ga. App. 356 (85 S. E. 366). The judge of the superior court, therefore, properly declined to dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

3. It appearing from the bill of exceptions that no exceptions to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ford v. ToomerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Davis v. RhodesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Young v. BroylesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  4. Chandler v. BaggettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  5. Humphries v. NalleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baggs-Langford Motor Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Bailey v. WareCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Worth v. Borough of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API