Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Ware

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 1, 1917No. 7566PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Certiorari; from Fulton superior court—Judge Bell. April 1, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

When this case was here before (17 Ga. App. 492, 87 S. E. 712), the court decided that the judge “erred in allowing exceptions to the answer to be filed after the hearing was begun, and in sustaining them; ” and also erred in allowing “ an additional answer of the trial judge to become a part of the record in the case.” For these special reasons the judgment of the court below was reversed, without considering the other assignments of error in the petition for certiorari, except to decide that the trial court properly overruled the demurrer to the original petition. Held: (1) The effect of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bailey v. WareCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pittman v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Staub v. City of BaxleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API