Legal Opinion

Lechman v. Mills

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1907No. 6639PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Kittitas county, Rigg, J., entered June 25, 1906, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action for an injunction.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.

This action was brought to enjoin the defendants from keeping and maintaining a canal on and across certain lands which the plaintiff claims to own, and also from overflowing with water any portion of said lands by means of said canal together with dams or dikes. Following largely the order of statement found in the brief of respondents, we believe the following is a fair statement of the facts in the case: In the year 1879 one Briggs was the occupant, but not the owner, of the land over which this controversy exists, and which land the plaintiff now claims to own. At that time it was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coventon v. SeufertOregon Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  3. Checketts v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1944
  4. McDonnell v. HuffineMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Southern Union Gas Co. v. CantrellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API