Legal Opinion

Harper v. Murray Construction Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1930PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.

We perceive no essential difference between the principle of law involved in this case and that announced in the case of Darden v. Lassiter, 198 N. C., 427. It was pointed out in the Darden case that a variety of circumstances and conditions might enter into the question as to whether the work of fine grading in the bottom of a ditch was “dangerous or otherwise.” Upon authority of the Darden case, we are constrained to hold that there was sufficient, evidence of negligence to be submitted to the jury.

Manifestly, the plaintiff ran the wrong way when the call of danger sounded, because he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hinton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Pegram v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. McKay v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Darden v. Robert G. Lassiter & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API