Legal Opinion
United States v. Wayne Stephens
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 29, 2005No. 03-2964PublishedCited by 94 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
Wayne Stephens was employed as a manager in a technical support unit for Accenture’s New York office when he repeatedly used an “add to pay” function on his time and expense reports to obtain a total of approximately $67,395 in unauthorized cash advances for personal use. That conduct resulted in his criminal conviction for wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343.
In his position at Accenture, Stephens was required to use the computer program called Automatic Remote Time and Expense System (ARTES) to file a bi-weekly time and expense report (hereinafter…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Miller-El v. DretkeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by94 opinions
- Pirelli Armstrong Tire Corp. Retiree Medical Benefits Trust v. Walgreen Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Steven Lisle, Jr. v. William WelbornCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- United States v. John J. Leahy, William E. Stratton, James M. Duff, and Terrence DolanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- People v. SánchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.