Legal Opinion

Uscian v. Blacconeri

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 18, 1975No. 61227PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNAMARA

Plaintiffs, Lauretta Uscian and Dorothea Moderhock, brought an action against defendants, Carmelo and Nancy Blacconeri, to have a certain real estate contract declared void and removed as a cloud on their title. Defendants filed a counterclaim for specific performance of tire contract and damages. The trial court, sitting without a jury, initially denied the relief sought by plaintiffs and entered an order of specific performance in favor of defendants. After granting plaintiffs’ petition for reconsideration, the court reversed its finding, denied specific performance, and declared the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pocius v. FleckIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Aldrich v. AldrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Stein v. McKinneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Able v. Pure Oil CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  5. Chicago Land Clearance Commission v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Morris v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. People Ex Rel. Foreman v. Village of Round Lake ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. Mapes v. Kalva Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  4. Behr v. Club Med, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Conductron Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API