Legal Opinion

Klipp v. New York State Civil Service Commission

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1964PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFred J. Munder, J.

The petitioners, in this article 78 proceeding, seek an order directing the State Civil Service Commission to approve an amendment to the Bules and Appendices of the Suffolk County Civil Service Commission which would place three Deputy County Clerks in the exempt class.

Acting pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 526 of the County Law the Board of Supervisors, by resolution, created three positions of Deputy County Clerk, one in Grade 25 and two in Grade 23, all three to be in the exempt class. The resolution creating such positions added “ it being understood that the classification of such…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ottinger v. State Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  2. National Psychological Ass'n for Psychoanalysis, Inc. v. University of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Matter of Rohr v. KenngottNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  4. Matter of Kraus v. SingstadNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Amico v. Erie County LegislatureAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
  2. Fitzgerald v. WashingtonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1975
  3. Mohr v. GiambraNew York Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Saratoga Springs Municipal Civil Service Commission v. New York State Civil Service CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Liss v. New York State Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API