Saratoga Springs Municipal Civil Service Commission v. New York State Civil Service Commission
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam J. Crangle, J.
The Legislature by section 20 of the Civil Service Law has given petitioner rule-making powers subject to approval by the respondent. In this proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR the petitioner seeks to force respondent to approve a rule establishing the jurisdictional classification of one of its officers (the position of City Engineer) as noncompetitive. Respondent argues that its refusal to approve petitioner’s classification resolution was proper and reasonable and that in any event petitioner has no standing to complain as a party in this special proceeding.
Respondent cites cases in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Andresen v. RiceNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Ottinger v. State Civil Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Matter of Barthelmess v. . CukorNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Matter of Kaney v. New York State Civil Service Comm.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Kaney v. New York State Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kerr v. UrstadtNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Kerr v. UrstadtNew York Supreme Court · 1973