Legal Opinion

Barber v. Special Indemnity Fund

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided April 12, 1994No. 81642PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANSEN, Judge:

Appellants, John Barber and Stewart Moss, seek review of the trial court’s order which sustained Appellees’, Special Indemnity Fund (the Fund) and Claudette Henry as State Treasurer (Garnishee), motion to vacate a garnishment order and to dismiss garnishment proceedings. We affirm.

Appellant Barber obtained an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court against the Special Indemnity Fund for permanent total disability. Appellant Moss was Barber’s attorney and was awarded an attorney fee in lump sum payable every fifth week until recouped. Based on the Fund’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Special Indemnity Fund v. FigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  2. Petroleum Maintenance Co. v. HerronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Carl Merveldt & Son v. BiggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fehring v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Samson Resources Co. v. SemCrude, L.P. (In re SemCrude, L.P.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2009
  3. Multiple Injury Trust Fund v. DeanCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Broadway Medical Center, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Department of Central ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API