Legal Opinion

Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Lumpkins

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 20, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

The defendant (plaintiff in error) is a common carrier, and maintains a service station at Pocahontas, Virginia, where its engines take on coal, water and sand. There were two “hostlers” there, plaintiff’s decedent *178and one J. A. Haley, whose duty it was to supply those things, wipe off and polish the engines, and do such other casual work on them as' might be necessary. J. A. Black was “agent and yard master, a kind of supervisory position,” and had been in charge since 1915. The locomotives served at this yard were engaged in hauling trains in interstate commerce, and so the decedent was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. American Railroad Co. of Porto Rico v. DidricksenSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gamble v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. WilmouthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  3. Gamble v. HillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967
  4. Wharton v. GoddardWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API