Legal Opinion

James J. v. People

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 29, 1989No. Nos. 1—88—3231, 1—88—3232, 1—88—3239 consPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

Upon motion of the State’s Attorney, petitions for adjudication of wardship filed on behalf of three minors were dismissed. The public guardian, as the minors’ attorney and guardian ad litem, appeals that dismissal. The issues presented for review are whether (1) this appeal should be dismissed due to the public guardian’s failure to proceed under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 306(a)(l)(v) (107 Ill. 2d R. 306(a)(l)(v)); and (2) the circuit court erred in dismissing the petitions to adjudicate wardship on the ground that it did not have the authority to require the State to prosecute the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Carey v. CousinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People Ex Rel. Daley v. MoranIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People Ex Rel. Davis v. VazquezIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. PiccoloIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  5. People v. RotramelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re JJIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. M.B.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. In re A.F.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API