Legal Opinion

Irick v. Elkins

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1933No. 3849PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDSPETH, Justice.

This is an action of replevin to recover possession of fifty head of coming three year old Herford heifers, branded One Bar (| — ), and damages for the detention thereof.

In February, 1929, Roy Irick, the plaintiff herein, entered into an agreement with one Vick Hail whereby the latter was to take charge of a ranch belonging to Trick, known as the Agua Torres ranch and located in Socorro county, for a period of six years. By the terms of this agreement, Irick was to stock the ranch and pay all of its running expenses ; the profits were to be applied to the payment to Irick of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. McKnightNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Childers v. Southern Pacific Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State v. GonzalesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  4. James v. HoodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DeWitty v. DeckerWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State v. NuttallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
  3. James v. AndersonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Vaughan v. WolfeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API