Matter of Goldschmidt v. . Hardy
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 9, 1917, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the corporation counsel of the city of New York to execute a certificate to the effect that the relator was the prevailing party in a certain proceeding entitled “ The People of the State of New York ex rel.
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 9, 1917, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the corporation counsel of the city of New York to execute a certificate to the effect that the relator was the prevailing party in a certain proceeding entitled “ The People of the State of New York ex rel. Hermann E. Goldschmidt, Relator, against The Board of Education of the City of New York Defendant,” and fixing the value of the services rendered by counsel in…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J', Chase, Collin, Ctjddeback, Cardozo, Pound and Andrews, JJ.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Kilroe v. CraigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- People ex rel. Vicary v. ThurstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934