Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Vicary v. Thurston

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1934Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum. The resolution of the common council of the city of Lockport creating the position in question fixed the duties of the incumbent. The appointee is given authority to investigate only, and not to decide who should or should not receive relief. Relator was an employee and not a public officer. (Matter of Goldschmidt v. Hardy, 177 App. Div. 547; affd., 223 N. Y. 575; La Chicotte v. City of New York, 166 App. Div. 279.) The moving papers show that the position was put in the competitive class, and that the relator successfully passed the required…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. La Chicotte v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  2. Matter of Goldschmidt v. . HardyNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. In re GoldschmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API