Legal Opinion

United States v. Brown

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 19, 1915No. 1592PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 38205.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomeey, Presiding Judge

The appellees imported merchandise, the liquidation of duties upon which was had on September 22,1913, under the act of 1909. Protest was filed with the collector on October 4, 1913, one day after the act of 1913 took effect. No protest fee was paid within the time prescribed by that act. At the hearing a motion was made to dismiss the proceeding for failure to pay this fee. Admittedly this motion should have been granted if the requirement for the payment of a protest fee is applicable to a case in which liquidation took place under the act of 1909. The board held that the right to proceed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bechtel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  2. Scaramelli v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. United States v. B. Holman, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  4. C. J. Tower & Sons v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938
  5. Eurasia Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API