Legal Opinion
James Oakley v. City of Longmont and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 8, 1989No. 89-1021PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before MOORE, ANDERSON, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges. JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Upon appellees’ motion for rehearing, it is ordered that rehearing is granted. The mandate is recalled. Upon rehearing, the court’s first opinion in the case, Oakley v. City of Longmont, 887 F.2d 249 (10th Cir.1989), is withdrawn. The attached opinion is substituted in its place. The suggestion for rehearing en banc is denied without prejudice. The mandate is reissued forthwith.
Before MOORE, ANDERSON, and BRORBY, Circuit Judges.
JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Telvest, Inc. v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1980
- Oakley v. City of LongmontDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1988
3Cited by33 opinions
- Caluza v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
- David and Carolyn Gaskell v. The Harvard Cooperative Society, David and Carolyn Gaskell v. The Harvard Cooperative SocietyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Talley v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1992
- Geissal v. Moore Medical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Mogretta McGee v. Pete Funderburg, as Trustee for Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 665 Health and Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.