Legal Opinion

Hieatzman v. Braecklein

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 12, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. (Dawkins, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPattison, J.

The appellee, the patentee of an improved device for sealing bottles, in December, 1915, assigned unto the appellant an undivided one-tenth part of all his right, title and interest in the patent.

In the month of February following, a company, with a capital stock of two hundred and fifty thousand dollars ($250,000), divided into twenty-five thousand (25,000) shares, each share of the par value of ten dollars ($10), was incorporated for the manufacture and sale of the patented article, and the appellant and all others to whom the appellee had assigned an interest in said patent, re-assigned…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Koogle v. ClineCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
  2. Fusting v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
  3. Cunningham v. DwyerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1865
  4. Mayfield v. KilgourCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  5. Stallings v. GottschalkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tooley v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Raith v. LecknerBaltimore City Circuit Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API