Legal Opinion

JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Bruno

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 18, 2008PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On August 25, 2006, plaintiff commenced this action to foreclose a mortgage given to it by defendant Anna Bruno. The action was also commenced against Anna Bruno’s husband, Joseph Bruno. While the mortgage listed only Anna Bruno as the mortgagor, plaintiff asserted causes of action for reformation to add Joseph Bruno as a mortgagor and for an equitable mortgage *363against him. Citibank, which held a money judgment against Joseph Bruno, was also named as a defendant. Plaintiff personally served Citibank’s designated agent (see CPLR 318) on August 30, 2006; Citibank’s deadline to answer was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fekete v. Camp SkwereAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. CIT Group/Commercial Services, Inc. v. 160-09 Jamaica Avenue Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Okun v. TannersNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Stillman v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berardo v. GuilletAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Chevalier v. 368 E. 148th Street Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Paulino v. Café BilliardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API