Legal Opinion

Okun v. Tanners

New York Court of Appeals

Decided September 11, 2008PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, plaintiff’s cross motion to restore the action to the calendar denied and defendant’s motion to dismiss the action as abandoned dismissed as unnecessary. The certified question should be answered in the negative.

Under the circumstances, plaintiffs conclusory and unsubstantiated claim of law office failure does not constitute a reasonable excuse for the 20-month delay in pursuing the action. Further, plaintiffs inactivity between the time the action was marked off the calendar and defendant’s…

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. AWL Industries, Inc. v. QBE InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Carducci v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Admiral Insurance v. Marriott International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Agli v. O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  5. Trokaik Realty, Inc. v. HP Yuco, HDFC, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API