Legal Opinion
Lucht v. Molalla River School District
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided June 25, 1999No. CV-98-1375-STPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PANNE R, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart filed her Findings and Recommendation on April 23, 1999. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate Judge’s report. 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982).
Defendant filed timely…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McDonnell Douglas Corporation v. Commodore Business MacHines Inc. And Commodore Business MacHines (Canada) LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- North Dakota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mrs. W. v. TirozziCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Daniel S., a Minor by His Parents and Next Friends, Cynthia and Scott S. Cynthia S. Scott S., on Their Own Behalf v. Scranton School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Daniel S., a Minor by His Parents and Next Friends, Cynthia and Scott S. Cynthia S. Scott S., on Their Own Behalf v. Scranton School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- S. v. Scranton School Dist.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000